When our clinical colleagues ask us, “How do I know that all of my equipment is safe to use on my patients,” and we answer with, “Well, all of our PMs are always done on time,” is that really the most reassuring response? Wouldn’t it be better if our response was more like the following?
“Well, there are some pieces of equipment, like the knee exerciser over there, that are not very complicated and which couldn’t possibly injure a patient, even if they failed completely. Such items are classified as noncritical, and they only need very simple maintenance to keep them functional. A lot of the equipment on the hospital’s inventory falls into this noncritical category.
“There are some other items, such as this critical care ventilator and this transport incubator, that are critical in the sense that if they fail completely, a patient could be injured. These kinds of devices are classified as reliability-critical, and we take a number of steps to make sure that the possibility of them failing completely is very rare. These kinds of devices are designed to be very reliable. For devices in this category, we follow all of the manufacturer’s recommendations for preventive maintenance, and we carefully analyze every instance when one of these types of device fails. We also monitor the statistics from our national database to confirm that each make and model of the devices that we classify as reliability-critical demonstrates an average or mean time between failures (MTBF) of at least several hundred years.
“We have some other types of devices, such as this patient monitoring system and this infant incubator, which can, in theory, cause patient injury if they fail in such a way that they are either providing substantially inaccurate and misleading information, or they have degraded to the point that they are no longer meeting the relevant safety specifications. All of the different ways that these kinds of devices, which we classify as performance/safety-critical devices, could fail have been identified as potentially critical failures. These kinds of failures are called hidden failures because they can usually be discovered only by performing some kind of periodic performance verification or safety testing. Such devices are also designed to be very reliable and, often, to warn the operator of any hidden failures. We have been collecting and aggregating the results of these performance and safety tests in our nationwide database and, again, we have confirmed that each make and model that we have of these performance/safety-critical devices develop potentially critical failures only very, very infrequently. Our database shows that these kinds of hidden failures occur, on the average, less than once every 500 years.”
The suggested answer above is, of course, meant only to illustrate the principle. The underlined statements will need to be customized to each specific facility and adjusted to reflect the levels of safety that can be substantiated by actual test data.
If you agree that this is the kind of response that we should aim to provide, then you are invited to join us in exploring how we could assemble just such a database. You can do this by visiting HTMcommunityDB.org. After clicking on the “here” link on the opening page, you will be able to see the main page. This is a password protected Wiki-type website, so follow the instructions at the top of the main page to gain read-only access. When asked to log in, use “view” as your username and “view” as your password. Do not attempt to create an account.
After you have reviewed the initial material, which is completely tentative at this point, e-mail your comments on the concept of the project and on the preliminary material to the address for the initial task force, which is email@example.com.
Malcolm Ridgway, PhD, CCE, is chief clinical engineer at ARAMARK Healthcare Technologies. Alan Lipschultz, CCE, PE, CSP, is president and CEO of HealthCare Technology Consulting LLC.