Matthew B. Weinger: Can We Make Patient-Centered Care Really Patient Centered?

September 20, 2016

Human Factors, Patient Safety, Systems

If we are to move from our current provider-centered system toward a more patient-centered system of healthcare, we must understand the obstacles. The Institute of Medicine defines patient-centered care as “providing care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions.” How can we be sure that we understand what is important to patients, and by what standards they judge the goodness of the care we provide? And how do we handle the divergence between patient and provider judgments of good care?

My team at Vanderbilt recently completed a PCORI-funded study of patient and provider perceptions of healthcare experiences. We interviewed 284 patients and their families, and the clinicians who cared for them, to capture non-routine events (or NREs), which are defined as any event that deviates from optimal or expected care for a specific patient in a specific clinical situation. We evaluated whether patient or family reported NREs occurred in the course of care during four types of acute clinical encounters–adult ambulatory surgery, pediatric cardiac surgery, pediatric outpatient chemotherapy, and adults with acute coronary syndrome undergoing cardiac catheterization.

What we learned was surprising: There was a huge disconnect between patient/family- and clinician-reported events. Very few of the 422 patient/family reported NREs were also reported by their clinicians, who reported 842 NREs of their own. In fact, a substantial number of NREs deemed important to care and safety by patients and their families were unknown to the clinicians caring for them.

One example: An elderly male patient came in for routine outpatient surgery, during which he had an unexpected cardiac arrest. After being resuscitated, he was admitted to the ICU overnight for close monitoring. The operating room clinicians all reported the cardiac arrest as an NRE. The patient-reported NREs were: 1) “Something was wrong with my heart during the surgery, and I wasn’t able to go home right afterwards”; 2) “The door to my room was squeaky and the noise kept me up much of the night.” Notably, he rated the severity of the second NRE higher than the first.

The focus of patients and families was on their personal experience as they encounter the healthcare system: their individual needs, preferences, and expectations. In contrast, clinicians focus on their work experience, framed by their own and the teams’ myriad competing priorities and needs. While both groups’ NRE reports emphasize deficiencies of communication and of process, they really highlight two different world views of our systems of care.

Each stakeholder in this complex system has a different agenda with its own set of imperatives, priorities, and preferences. Does this mean that patient-centered care is doomed to failure? I hope not, since it is the right thing to do for individual patients and for society as a whole. But as this study reveals, we must first focus on the delivery of care that patients and families actually want and need. Then, we must all work together to consistently deliver safe and effective personal health experiences–at a lower overall cost than we do today. More on the how in a future blog.

Matthew B. Weinger, MD, is professor of anesthesiology, biomedical informatics, and medical education at the Center for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety (CRISS) with Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, TN. He is a staff physician, GRECC, with the VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System. And he serves as vice chair of medical research with the AAMI Board of Directors.

Connect

Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

One Comment on “Matthew B. Weinger: Can We Make Patient-Centered Care Really Patient Centered?”

  1. Steve S. Says:

    I agree that the things that are concerning to patients and their families are vastly different than those things that concern doctors.

    Doctors are concerned with clinical operations and outcomes. Patients are concerned with quality-of-life matters, although these concerns are often very basic (temperature, noise, light, pain, anxiety, hunger, thirst) because of the nature of hospitalization.

    It is the role of nurses and family members to bridge the gap for patients to provide the best personalized hospitalization experience possible; however, there are conditions and situations which cannot be addressed by family members or nurses. These are the institutional issues with buildings, equipment, facility protocols and common medical practices; and they remain unperceived and unaddressed by hospital staff. There is plenty of low-hanging fruit, but the facility staff must ask the right questions in the right way.

    I have received paper questionnaires from a hospital asking for an evaluation with the goal of earning a 10-star rating for the hospital stay. My copy has been copied from a copy thousands of times and any comments will probably go into a database for statistical analysis. It would be unproductive to spend the time to provide the insights learned over the period of months and years of caring for a family member in the hospital setting for it to be plugged into a statistical analysis that will essentially ignore the most important details of the information I could take the time to provide.

    Certainly people who want to focus on patient-centered healthcare would gain perspective spending time as a patient or family member of a patient, but because this is not practical, nor particularly efficient, I suggest contacting patients and family members who have spent a lot of time in a facility and have the background to provide key insights and assessments in a personal interview.

    But how far can the relationship between hospital and patients/families be taken? The current arms-length relationship developed out of regulatory and legal necessity. I am suggesting a relationship built on mutual trust.

    My loved one has lived on the cutting edge of what has been medically possible in cardiac care since the day she was born with multiple congenital heart defects. Today with the gift of a transplanted heart she was lucky enough to receive she is living well still. I know this hospital. I have spent years in this hospital observing and providing unsolicited feedback when necessary. It is also my profession to design experiments, observe and report.

    Without this hospital my loved one would have a very short future. It is in my best interest to help it continually improve in any way I can. It would be in the best interest of the hospital to recognize this relationship, extend some trust, find more relationships of this sort: And to ask us the right questions in the right way.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: